Byzantine Polycandelon

by Aelfgifu verch Morgan

Figure 1. Bronze polycandelon with three (of nine) blown lamps. Eastern Mediterranean, 6th -8th century CE. Gemeentemuseum, The Hague.

 

 

Why a Polycandelon?

I became fascinated with polycandelons after seeing the one at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York (fig. 10), during a visit there in 2003, and after viewing one on display at Dumbarton Oaks earlier the same year during their Byzantine conference. The prospect of combining metalworking and glass skills in a way that was both beautiful and useful intrigued me, and I determined that I must make one.

What is a Polycandelon?     

            Polycandelons are an early form of candelabra utilizing oil lamps rather than candles. They were commonly used in the Byzantine Empire from roughly the 6th to 12th  century, and throughout Europe at varying times.  Polycandelons were used in both secular and religious settings, and were made in a variety of forms and materials.

Makers and Owners

            The components of a Polycandelon would have been made by several different people because specialized skills were utilized in the construction of each part.  Skills generally needed include glass blowing and one or more forms of metalwork. I made all of the components of my polycandelon myself.

            Polycandelons were used in such places as churches and wealthy private residences. They range from very simple, to incorporating complex designs. Religious polycandelons often contain imagery such as crosses. Polycandelons sometimes contain purely secular decorations like scroll patters, circles, part circles, and quatrefoils. These designs were used to cast complex shadows. Design variations can be seen in the pictures of polycandelons throughout this paper. As the polycandelon I made is intended for personal use, I chose not to use Christian symbols, and instead incorporated quatrefoils and scroll designs as decorative motifs.[1] [2]

Overall Form

            The specific forms of polycandelons vary somewhat, but basically consist of some sort of planar metal circle or rectangle containing holes which hold glass lamps. The glass lamps are either shaped like cones (fig. 1, 3, 4) or like bowls with a hollow elongated stems attached (fig. 2).

 

Figure 2. Plain bronze ring polycandelon. Date Unknown. Museum of Madaba, Jordan.

 

The metals used in the polycandelons range from bronze, brass, copper alloy (fig. 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12) or iron (chain in fig. 1 & 2) to silver (fig. 9). Polycandelons are either suspended from the ceiling with a hook or loop or from the wall by means of a bracket. I have chosen to construct my polycandelon in the form of glass cones set into a bronze ring, with a forged iron chain and loop to suspend it from the ceiling or a stand for display.   

The Glass Lamps

 

Figure 3. Blown glass lamps with blue spots. Eastern Mediterranean, 6th -8th century CE. Gemeentemuseum, The Hague.

Figure 4. Glass lamps, 6th – 7th century CE. Cologne Archaeological Museum.

Form

I chose to make cone shaped lamps, as they appear to be more suitable to the earlier Byzantine polycandelons, instead of the stemmed lamps which seem to be more common later through out Europe. While there are some examples of lamps with decoration, undecorated lamps of a tinted color, such as seen in figure 4, are most prevalent, so I chose to emulate those.

Tools

            The tools and techniques we use in glass blowing today are essentially the same type used in the Middle Ages. The basic tools of a glass blower include those used to actually melt and cool the glass and those used in forming it.

            The tools used for heating and cooling are:

·          a furnace to melt and hold glass

·          a place to re-heat glass - either the mouth of the furnace or an additional heating area modernly called a “glory hole”

·          An annealer to gradually cool off the finished glass so it doesn’t crack while cooling.

            There are several different examples of medieval glass shops that can be observed in pictures and from descriptions, and they all include these heating and cooling tools. Unfortunately, while glass is available from most periods, all of the pictures and descriptions of tools, furnaces, and techniques are from later periods or different geographical areas. In, On Divers Arts, written by Theophilus somewhere between the 10th and 12th centuries CE, methods for creating a furnace for working glass and for making an annealing furnace are described.[3] Another example is from a description and wood cut of a furnace from the Pirotechnia of Vannoccio Biringuccio: The Classic Sixteenth-Century Treatise on Metals and Metallurgy (fig. 5). [4]

Figure 5. The Pirotechnia of Vannoccio Biringuccio. Furnace for melting, working, and annealing glass. Woodcut.

As other illustrations of medieval glass shops include the same aspects – an annealer, a melt furnace, and a place to re-heat glass. As all of these elements these are necessary to the craft of glass blowing, it seems reasonable to assume that they would be part of a Byzantine glass shop. These furnaces were fueled with wood, and fires were kept stoked by apprentices and workers who carefully watch the quality and heat of the fire. A modern glass shop such as the one where I made my lamps consists of the same elements, but is run off of electricity and natural (or sometimes propane) gas for fuel, with regulators to do the jobs of the apprentices and workers.

            The tools used for shaping the glass are:

  • a blowpipe -on which to blow the glass
  • a punty -on to which the glass vessel is transferred when it is time to open the mouth of the vessel
  • a marver -a place to roll the glass to shape and cool it
  • jacks -used for cutting in necks and pulling necks on bottles
  • tweezers -used for pulling out bits of glass
  • shears -used for cutting and trimming glass

            These tools can be seen in medieval illustrations in manuscripts such as seen in figure 6. Here a glass blower can be seen blowing through a pipe and marvering the bubble of glass on some sort of flat surface.

Figure 6. Depiction of a forest glass shop from Sir John Mandeville’s Travels, Dated  1420 – 1450. British Library, London.

 

Tools and techniques have also been mentioned in descriptions. One particularly good description is from the The Pirotechnia of Vannoccio Biringuccio (pg. 130-131):

It (glass) is worked by being blown by men’s breath with certain iron tubes... With one of these they take the glass from the pot by attaching it to the point and then wrapping it around... and giving it the form of a large ball. The first thing they do after withdrawing it is to press it on marble, turning it over and over so that it unites. The blowing on it through the opening of the tube they make it like a bubble and they elongate it by swinging it about their heads... and finally, in short, they give it the form of the vessel which they wish by warming and blowing, by pressing and enlarging. Then separating it from the first tube they take hold of it again at the bottom with the other (tube) and improve it, cutting its mouth with a pair of shears...”

 

These are the same type of tools used today in glass blowing, and are what I used in creation of my lamps.

Glass

            Most glass shops imported glass from other areas to use in furnaces. Usually glass would be melted down into ingots near a source of materials, and then exported. Then it would be crushed up into “cullet” to use in the glass furnace for re-melting, occasionally raw materials would be shipped and combined in the glass furnaces, and this is modernly called “batch”. Glass from failed attempts which was not polluted by colored glass would usually be saved, crushed, and re-melted in the form of “cullet”. Such glass was sometimes even exported from places like Syria to Venice. [5] [6] [7] The shop where I blow glass buys it in the form of batch, and adds in recycled glass in the form of cullet, in a similar fashion to some medieval glass houses.

            The glass I use is one of the types of glass made in the Middle Ages. There were three major kinds of medieval glass: pot-ash glass, soda-lime glass, and high-lead glass. All three types of glass were used through out the medieval world, depending on what materials were available. The glass used in the shop where I blow glass is soda-lime glass. The usual temperature for the working range of medieval soda-lime and pot-ash glass was around 1800 - 2000 degrees Fahrenheit. The glass I use is workable at temperatures between about 1900 and 2100 degrees Fahrenheit, and thus of a relatively similar working range. [8] [9]

            While I used a medieval type of glass in my projects, is much purer (clearer) than most medieval glass except Venetian crystalo. Glass manufacturers were always working toward glass that was more pure and clear, but usually glass was tinted by minerals. Common tint colors included: blue-green, olive green, amber, brown, and yellow. I chose to add an artificial tint to my glass using fine yellow frit or crushed glass, in imitation of early crystallo attempts. I feel that this gives my lamps a more medieval appearance. [10]

Figure 7. Polycandela. Metal. Byzantine, 500-600. Royal Ontario Museum

The Metal Holder

Technique

            I cast a bronze ring for my polycandelon based on period methods as laid out in sources such as, The Pirotechnia of Vannoccio Biringuccio, Theophilus’ ,On Divers Arts, and, The Treatises of Benvenuto Cellini. While many polycandelons remain mostly intact, I have not been able to find a written Byzantine bronze casting account or any sort of pictorial images of Byzantine bronze casting. I therefore have relied heavily on the sources listed above for specific techniques as being the closest available sources. Theophilus is the closest in time period, as his work is thought to have originated from between the 10th and 12th centuries. However, Theophilus’ descriptions are of specific projects which differ in many elements from mine, and I referred to the later works of Cellini and Biringuccio often as they more generally discuss casting and offer other ideas about materials and techniques that are equally plausible.

I cast several rings over a series of two years experimenting with medieval techniques before achieving a good, easy to clean up casting that filled correctly. In my first attempts I experimented with both medieval mold materials and my own furnace. After several failures, I decided to concentrate entirely on my mold materials and casting method, while using a modern gas powered furnace. My next step will be building a medieval furnace in which to heat the metal. The only modern tools I used in creation of my bronze lamp holder were the kiln in which I burnt out the mold, the furnace, crucible, and the tools used to move the furnace from the crucible.  All of my mold making and finishing work was done using period methods and tools.

 

 

The Mold

            I used the lost-wax method to cast my bronze lamp holder. I first constructed a wax ring exactly like that which I wished to cast in bronze. As I was experimenting with methods and did not know how successful I would be, I then made a two piece plaster mold which allowed me to make as many waxes as needed. This method is mentioned in period, though in the late period, Pirotechnia.[11] I then experimented with a variety of different clay and fiber combinations for mold materials.  I used a combination of techniques taken from Theophilus’, On Divers Arts, the Pyrotechnia of Vaccoccio Biringuccio, and ,the Treatise of Benvenuto Cellini on Goldsmithing and Sculpting. While Theophilus is the most contemporary in period to Byzantine bronze working, general casting techniques do not appear to differ greatly, and the, Pyrotechnia, and the Treatises of Cellini provide useful additions to the specific projects that Theophilus discusses. The basic process for making a mold which Theophilus describes uses clay or clay mixed with dung as the materials for making molds, and wax or tallow for the shape of the object which is melted out.[12] The later, sixteenth century, Pyrotechnia of Vannoccio Biringuccio, discusses casting more generally various other options for fiber additives to clay as well as the specific process of looking for clay that is appropriate for mold-making. While I did some experimentation with using horse dung as an additive for clay, the necessity of burning out my mold in my parents’ kitchen made me look for fiber alternatives. Additives mentioned in the Pyrotechnia include wool cloth clippings, coarse sand, iron scale, crushed brick, wool cardings, edges taken from cloth, hairs taken from tannery skins, dung of horses donkeys, mules, cows, chopped flax tinder, cane flowers, and finely cut straw.[13] I cast several molds using finely cut straw in combination with the clay as this was a readily available material that was definitely available to the Byzantines. After having a lot of problems with flashing I turned to another source of strengthening fiber. In my later and more successful attempt I combined clippings of wool thread with my clay, and this produced admirable results. Theophilus does not discuss what sorts of clay are desirable for casting bronze, so I once again turned to the later and more complete Pyrotechnia, which devotes an entire chapter to the subject. The desirable clay is described as: “neither unctuous nor lean, neither wholly tender nor rough, and with a grain that is fine, without pebbles or shells. When applied to a work they easily dry out without fractures and, when dry hold their own shape well. Above all they must resist fire well.”[14]  Cellini says much the same thing, adding that the soil preferably comes from near rivers, as it then also has a little sandieness which is desirable.[15] Luckily for me, the soil around my parents’ house fits that description aptly, including being less than a mile from a river bank. I dug up my clay, from a likely spot (my parents’ back field), and found it to be of a nice consistency. My final mold material ended up being a combination of finely cut up wool thread and clay. I brushed on layers of wet clay first, to preserve the surface texture of the wax design, then pressed more a more dense clay and thread combination around the mold. I let the mold dry, then burned out the mold in a kiln. I kept the mold warm by insulating it in a basket of sand until the bronze was poured in, to facilitate the flow of metal.

 

 

Finishing the Lamp Holder

            Theophilus mentions a wide range of tools in his text, including files, engravers, scrapers, punches, chisels, a sort of wire brush made from bundles of cut wire imbedded in lead, and shredded sticks which were all used in the finishing process.[16] I used a saw, chisels, punches, hammers, files, scrapers, and wire brushes to clean up my finished casting. I also resorted to using one power tool – an electric drill. I forget to leave holes for the chain to connect to the casting in my wax. Luckily, I did remember to leave wide spots in which to make the holes. All of the other tools I used are similar to those mentioned in Theophilus. While not achieving a perfect finish, I did achieve one that compliments the lamps and reflects light nicely, giving rich overall appearance.  

 

Design

            I chose a design based on the circle, a popular pattern which can be observed from the polycandelon examples below. I chose to not include crosses, as I want this to be a light source a private home, not for a church. I desired a fairly complex design, and based my design on holding six lamps, as that seems to have been a commonly used number. I included circles, quatrefoils, connecting bars, and scroll work based on the polycandelons shown in figures 7, 8, 9, & 10.  

Figure 8. Polycandelon for 16 lamps. 7th century CE. University of Pennsylvania Museum

 

Figure 9. Silver Circular Polycandelon. Byzantine, 6th century CE. Antalya Museum     


Figure 10. Copper alloy Polycandelon with Crosses, Byzantine, 500–600. Diameter 10 1/2 in.
Metropolitan Museum of Art.

 

The Chain     

            The chain on all of the polycandelons I have observed is fairly small, and seems to not be welded in some cases while in others it is hard to tell if it is welded or not. All of the polycandelons with chains present are suspend from three places up to a central hook. Sometimes the chains are from the same or a similar material as the section of the polycandelon which holds the lamps, sometimes not, and in some cases no distinction is made in the description. Sometimes the chain contains medallions, and the medallions I have seen contain Christian imagery, indicating a polycandelon which was used in a religious setting. I chose to forge my chain and hook from iron as I have access to a forge used for ferrous metals which runs on a period fuel - charcoal. I did not forge weld the chain as the examples where I can see the chain clearly do not seem to be welded or brazed together. This also makes sense as welded chain is only necessary for holding a lot of weight, and even filled with oil the polycandelon dose not weigh a great deal. I also chose to not include medallions as part of my chain as I do not want to include Christian imagery on my polycandelon.

            I used mild steel as the material for my chain, as real period-style iron is very expensive and mild steel is the most similar of modernly produced products.

            I forged the chain in period manner, using a charcoal burning forge, a hammer, an anvil, and tongs.  

Figure 11. Bronze polycandelon. Byzantine. Photograph from excavation of Hippos (Sussita).

 

Figure 12. Bronze Polycandelon. Byzantine, 7th to 12th century CE. Harlan J. Berk Ltd.

 

 

The Fuel and Wick

            I chose to use olive oil as the fuel for my lamp, as it would have been available in the Byzantine empire, an is also easily available to me. I a using cold pressed extra virgin olive oil as it is in a less refined state than other olive oils and more similar to the product that would have been available. Researchers disagree about weather oil would have been sued alone or floated on top of water in lamps. They also debate types of oil used, though generally people used what was available in their area. Oils suggested range from nut and olive to animal fats. It is also unknown if the lamps were entirely filled with oil or partially filled with water with oil floating on the top of the water. If the later case was true, the wicks needed to be short enough that they were wicking up oil rather than water.[17]

            Wick material for lamps also probably varied, depending on region. Possible materials include: flax, hemp, wool, and cotton. Some Islamic lamps had narrow glass tubes used to keep the wick in place. There is no evidence for that in Byzantine or later period lamps. Later lamps with a narrow stem, such as seem in England, may have relied upon the narrow stem to keep the wick in place.[18] Another solution is dipping the wick in wax to keep it stiff. For my wick I braided together three sections of linen cord to make a moderate sized wick similar to a modern candle wick. I then dipped it in bees wax to stiffen it. My wick seems to draw oil at a reasonable rate and makes a descent sized flame, as well as remaining in place fairly well.

            Some method is needed to hold the end of the wick above the level of the oil in the lamp. It is also desirable that the wick not simply be draped over the edge of the lamp as was sometimes done with the bowl shaped pottery and metal lamps, because the steep sides will not keep the wick above the fuel. The modern method for holding up the floating wick in glass Christian and Jewish liturgical lamps is to use a cork float with a thin metal sheet on top of it. A wax-dipped wick is inserted through this with the flame end just above the metal. Sometimes metal holders are also placed on the top of lamps. Metal clips have been found on lamps in tombs in France[19], however after having used a previous polycandelon attempt for two camping seasons, I have found floating wicks to be fore more effective than metal clips.  I made my own out of cork and thin copper foil with a slit through to the center. The wick could be inserted and when the wax melted would keep it in place. The major benefit of a floating wick was not having to move the metal holder up or down depending on the level of oil in the lamp.
Works Cited

<http://www.museum.upenn.edu/new/research/Roman%20Glass/index.html>. “Glass Making in Roman Times: Lighting in the Byzantine Era.” Museum Applied Science Center for Archaeology (MASCA), University of Pennsylvania Museum.

 

<http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/litu/hod_PG.7.2000.htm>.  Metropolitan Museum of Art Web Site, New York Copyright © 2000–2004 The Metropolitan Museum of Art.

 

Ashbee, C.R. (translated by).  The Treatises of Benvenuto Cellini on Goldsmithing and Sculpture. Dover Publications Inc., New York. 1967.

 

Jacoby, David. “Raw Materials for the Glass Industries of Venice and the Teraferma, About 1370 – 1460.” Journal of Glass Studies. Vol. 35. Corning, New York.1993. pg. 67,

 

Smith, Cyril Stanley, Martha Teach Gnudi (translated by). The Pirotechnia of Vannoccio Biringuccio: The Classic Sixteenth-Century Treatise on Metals and Metallurgy. Dover Publications, Inc. New York. 1990.

 

Theophilus On Divers Arts. Translated by John G. Hawthorne, Cyril Stanley Smith. Dover Publications, Inc., New York. 1979.

 

Toso, Gianfranco. Murano: a History of Glass. Arsenale Editrice. 2000.

 

Tyson, Rachel. Medieval Glass Vessels Found in England c AD 1200-1500. Council for British Archeology Report 121. 2000.

 

 



[1] <http://www.museum.upenn.edu/new/research/Roman%20Glass/index.html>. “Glass Making in Roman Times: Lighting in the Byzantine Era.” Museum Applied Science Center for Archaeology (MASCA), University of Pennsylvania Museum.

[2] <http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/litu/hod_PG.7.2000.htm>.  Metropolitan Museum of Art Web Site, New York Copyright © 2000–2004 The Metropolitan Museum of Art.

 

[3] Theophilus On Divers Arts. Translated by John G. Hawthorne, Cyril Stanley Smith. Dover Publications, Inc., New York. 1979. 49-52

[4] Smith, Cyril Stanley, Martha Teach Gnudi (translated by). The Pirotechnia of Vannoccio Biringuccio: The Classic Sixteenth-Century Treatise on Metals and Metallurgy. Dover Publications, Inc. New York. 1990. pg 128, 133.

[5] .Jacoby, David. “Raw Materials for the Glass Industries of Venice and the Teraferma, About 1370 – 1460.” Journal of Glass Studies. Vol. 35. Corning, New York.1993. pg. 67.

[6] Toso, Gianfranco. Murano: a History of Glass. Arsenale Editrice. 2000. pg. 26.

[7]  Tyson, Rachel. Medieval Glass Vessels Found in England c AD 1200-1500. Council for British Archeology Report 121. 2000. pg. 5.

[8] Jacoby, pg. 67.

[9] Tyson, pg. 5.

[10] Tyson, pg. 5 – 6

[11] Smith, Cyril Stanley, Martha Teach Gnudi (translated by). The Pirotechnia of Vannoccio Biringuccio: The Classic Sixteenth-Century Treatise on Metals and Metallurgy. Dover Publications, Inc. New York. 1990. pg 231.

 

[12] Theophilus,  pg 132 – 136, 167 – 170.

[13] Smith, pg 219.

[14] Smith, pg 218.

[15] Ashbee, C.R. (translated by).  The Treatises of Benvenuto Cellini on Goldsmithing and Sculpture. Dover Publications Inc., New York. 1967. pg 113.

[16] Smith, 85, 90 – 94, 114, 138.

[17] Tyson, pg 142.

[18] Ibid.

[19] Tyson, pg 141.